deathtoreddit
1d ago
•
100%
it did? how?
deathtoreddit
3d ago
•
100%
Ok, demcent in process
If the authorities will agree that a leader is martyred, a leader is martyred
Until then, all is up in the air
deathtoreddit
5d ago
•
100%
deathtoreddit
6d ago
•
100%
I thought it was derived off the U.S.S.R?
deathtoreddit
7d ago
•
100%
self-sufficiency (Is this Chinese 'Juche'?)
Zhuti gang, represent!
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
97%
Too bad it's for anti trans reasons 😔
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
Ok, I'm shocketh
Why is an insect like locust both halal and kosher?
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
Ok thanks for the response, glad we're on same terms
::: spoiler spoiler I can't take back my unwarranted rudeness, I just felt like you were one of those typical Lemmy libs that come here to do a one liner to 'own' us... So I said that impulsively
But it seems I was wrong :::
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
First of all, as one noted, Bosnia and Albania were part of Eastern socialist Block, Bahrain got its development through being a gulf oil-based state
Second, in making the more accurate comparison, how the fuck does India screw up more compare to China? You didn't answer my shit for that. India was left more untouched and preserved, compared to China's initial ruined state pre-Mao
Also, When did I say it was unparalleled?
Do you put words in people's mouths, like you put your dick in your mother's?
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
Wish it expanded more
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
Nothing new for liberals.... when their power is threatened by the working class of wage labor, from the 1848 revolution and around it, they critically support every reactionary force against them, in case they rise up...
The bourgeois republic triumphed. On its side stood the aristocracy of finance, the industrial bourgeoisie, the middle class, the petty bourgeois, the army, the lumpen proletariat organized as the Mobile Guard, the intellectual lights, the clergy, and the rural population. On the side of the Paris proletariat stood none but itself. More than three thousand insurgents were butchered after the victory, and fifteen thousand were deported without trial.
Remember especially, in monarchist countries like those in Europe, many capitalists that derived from the pre-capitalist landed aristocracy and aristocracy of finance in feudalism, besides the monarchy, still predominate...
deathtoreddit
2w ago
•
100%
We used to make steel...
India-owned Tata steel
Chinese-owned British Steel
Wait wtf
deathtoreddit
3w ago
•
100%
Something something "pero ang mga OFWs sa Israel!"
deathtoreddit
3w ago
•
100%
More like "if we don't stop Benny in Lebanon, then they'll attack Pakistan"
deathtoreddit
3w ago
•
100%
You did it, you said the thing "ecoMaoism"
deathtoreddit
3w ago
•
100%
"Honey, our child has decided to take up interest in vexillogy"
mronline.org
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5597930 > A good read on how Canada cultivated its "nice" image at first and how its ghoulishness has now inevitably bared its face.
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5504533 > I'm confused > > So far, I've heard that accumulation, technological advancement, and thus concentration of capital from the previous capitalist economy would leave its print on the later modern socialist economies > > But other than that, I've realized I've never looked much into what distinguishes AES's economic management, mainly of state-owned enterprises, from capitalist economy's management, in concrete policy > > I can understand co-operatives, but such orgs don't necessarily make up socialism, as you guys would say > > > ::: spoiler to Libs > If you gimme a deeply unserious answer, I will fuck your father > ___ > ::: >
I'm confused So far, I've heard that accumulation, technological advancement, and thus concentration of capital from the previous capitalist economy would leave its print on the later modern socialist economies But other than that, I've realized I've never looked much into what distinguishes AES's economic management, mainly of state-owned enterprises, from capitalist economy's management, in concrete policy I can understand co-operatives, but such orgs don't necessarily make up socialism, as you guys would say ::: spoiler to Libs If you gimme a deeply unserious answer, I will fuck your father ___ :::
The same with Mao, in terms of balancing good and bad policies, of their OWN time.
From https://hexbear.net/post/2838759
How does even mess up "Republique de Coree" for "Republique Populaire Democratique de Coree" Anyways, enjoy the recognition, boys!
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5107328 > Unless something more material like a whole continent turning anti-imperialist, if not socialist, and deciding collectively to nationalize the fruit and veg produce, and thus disrupts U.S's produce imports - > > I don't think any internal problems in America would reach to a boiling point, as to end on a conclusive note > > So what if it's a big deal to you, huh, America is the most armed-country, and has a lot of guns, yet no internal civil war(s), like we've seen in the 20th century like Argentina's Dirty War or China's, has occurred recently... it's just reactionary settler business as usual > > Im America, nichts neues >
Unless something more material like a whole continent turning anti-imperialist, if not socialist, and deciding collectively to nationalize the fruit and veg produce, and thus disrupts U.S's produce imports - I don't think any internal problems in America would reach to a boiling point, as to end on a conclusive note So what if it's a big deal to you, huh, America is the most armed-country, and has a lot of guns, yet no civil war(s) has occurred recently... it's just reactionary settler business as usual Im America, nichts neues
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5089720 > > > Ye see, I've been reading a book called "Cambodia 1975-1982" by Michael Vickery (you can find its pdf), and needless to say, its goal is to: > > prove{s} that the truth {of 'Democratic Kampuchea'} was much more complex than the situation as portrayed by anti-Communist Western media, by pro-revolutionary sympathizers, or by the regime itself, and would dishearten all three of those groups. > > > In the first half, it talks about how D.K Cambodia was split between 2 main power-holding sections, East Zone and Northwest (Viet-allied and gradualist) and Southwest (Anti-Viet, chauvinist), and the Southwest one led by Pol Pot won and purged the rest... > > 1975-1977 wasn't that bad (more or less attempted economic recovery), but 1977-1979 was Pol Pot's purge time we all know and hate... > > > Besides that, it talks of People's Republic of Kampuchea from 1979-1982... > > > I reached this section over here: > > Children's work in the old days though was accompanied by much fun and play, as the elephant dung story clearly indicates; and the suppression of fun and play is one of the things which distinguished DK invidiously from pre-revolutionary Cambodia. > > > > Among the comments accompanying the children's drawings was the account of a boy who had worked minding water buffalo, a typical children's chore in Cambodia. He told of being punished twice in one day, once for allowing the animal to run away, also typical, but once for laughing and joking while at work, which for Cambodia was entirely aberrant. > > Thoughts on this book, or just on D.K Cambodia?
Ye see, I've been reading a book called "Cambodia 1975-1982" by Michael Vickery (you can find its pdf), and needless to say, its goal is to: > prove{s} that the truth {of 'Democratic Kampuchea'} was much more complex than the situation as portrayed by anti-Communist Western media, by pro-revolutionary sympathizers, or by the regime itself, and would dishearten all three of those groups. Specifically, D.K Cambodia was split between 2 main power-holding sections, East Zone and Northwest (Viet-allied and gradualist) and Southwest (Anti-Viet, chauvinist), and the Southwest one led by Pol Pot won and purged the rest... 1975-1977 wasn't that bad (more or less attempted economic recovery), but 1977-1979 was Pol Pot's purge time we all know and hate... Besides that, it talks of People's Republic of Kampuchea from 1979-1982... I reached this section over here: > Children's work in the old days though was accompanied by much fun and play, as the elephant dung story clearly indicates; and the suppression of fun and play is one of the things which distinguished DK invidiously from pre-revolutionary Cambodia. > > Among the comments accompanying the children's drawings was the account of a boy who had worked minding water buffalo, a typical children's chore in Cambodia. He told of being punished twice in one day, once for allowing the animal to run away, also typical, but once for laughing and joking while at work, which for Cambodia was entirely aberrant. Thoughts on this book, or just on D.K Cambodia?
As an easter egg: if you recognize which user I am in hexbear, then ye know...
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2858492 > I think I understand the simple model of base and superstructure (but that was Gramsci's model) > > The simple use of quantitative to qualitative change, and vice versa > > The simple fact that contradictions can exist in a society, manifesting in the form of problems, which are symptoms of its economic systems... > > > I don't think its about thesis + anti-thesis -> synthesis. > > I think its about one economic class, like capitalist to feudal lord, dominating over one class, and absorbing its birthmark attributes, before surpassing its birthmarks overall... > > Or as if a capitalist upon its created proletariat, not only ruling over them, but co-opting or destroying any of its measures > > To me, its about who the ruling most HEGEMONIC class is, and how it operates... > > Other than that, I don't know how else to apply it, let alone know if its somewhat broadly accurate.... > > Correct me if I'm wrong, if not elaborate on what ye mean?
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/4937005 > If you know, you know > > > ::: spoiler spoiler > Most recent South American coup (attempt) against progressive anti-imperialist ruling government > ___ > ::: >
If you know, you know ::: spoiler spoiler Most recent South American coup (attempt) against progressive anti-imperialist ruling government ___ :::
Apparently, even if I put in English settings for my post, my post is not allowed... Here's what I wanted to post: https://web.archive.org/web/20231124232348/https://rebolusyongpangkultura.blogspot.com/2016/03/mga-kanta-ng-rebolusyong-pilipino.html#rebo36
Example: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/4856206 (Pamphletz not only reveals himself to be patsoc but believes Marxism is Catholic) Jaysus wept... can they not spill their beans?
> https://hexbear.net/post/2763051 Ang sarap pugutan ng ulo mga yan sino man magkalat mga anti-vax news....
veganhorizon.substack.com
yewtu.be
Tl;dr: mixed geopolitical interests, beyond just oil, power consolidation, Saudis or Zionism It can be thst all of them are equally important goals...