pinguinu
2d ago
•
100%
I lightly browsed two socialist accounts on Twitter. The amount of chauvinist brainworms in the replies was astounding, I don't understand how some of you people continue use that giant cognitohazard
pinguinu
2d ago
•
100%
La verdad que no, igual no tengo redes sociales xd
pinguinu
2d ago
•
100%
REINO HUNDIDO JAJAJAAJAJJA
me lo robo
pinguinu
4d ago
•
100%
It's over beanbros, beanis has endorsed Harris
pinguinu
4d ago
•
100%
No, you see, all those billions of cars and funko pops are absolutely necessary. What? People die over pollution and exploitation? First time hearing it ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯
pinguinu
5d ago
•
100%
I mean, considering we're all liberals, not that far off
pinguinu
6d ago
•
100%
"European explorers ushered in a wave of devastation, violence, stealing land, and widespread disease, and that's why we're celebrating it and following in their footsteps!"
[Proxitok](https://github.com/pablouser1/ProxiTok) makes it possible to view Tiktok links in a privacy-respecting client. For example, take this video: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZIJW68vcC/ We can redirect it to a Proxitok instance (from [this list](https://github.com/pablouser1/ProxiTok/wiki/Public-instances), for example), and we get this: https://proxitok.pabloferreiro.es/redirect/search?term=https://vm.tiktok.com/ZIJW68vcC/&type=url The necessary code for this bot action would be: ``` [[reply]] regex = '((?:https://)?(?:vm|www)\.tiktok\.com/[\w\d?@&=%/-]*)' msg = ''' #(len(matches) == 1 ? "A Tiktok link was" : "Tiktok links were") detected in your #(type). Here are links to the same #(len(matches) == 1 ? "video" : "videos") on Proxitok, which is a Tiktok frontend that protects your privacy: #for(i, match in matches): #if(len(matches) > 1):Link #(i+1):#!if - [proxitok.pabloferreiro.es](https://proxitok.pabloferreiro.es/redirect/search?term=#(match[1])&type=url) - [proxitok.pussthecat.org](https://proxitok.pussthecat.org/redirect/search?term=#(match[1])&type=url) - [proxitok.privacydev.net](https://proxitok.privacydev.net/redirect/search?term=#(match[1])&type=url) #!for ''' ``` E: Wasn't really sure where to post this so I defaulted to here 😅 Also I haven't tested it, but I checked it on regex101 and it's correct
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5956472
pinguinu
7d ago
•
100%
88 years...
They "threatened" with a rent strike (illegal in Spain) Source and more pictures: https://loquesomos.org/derecho-a-la-vivienda-2/
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
Thanks for the heads up. I'll be sure not to step foot in North America 😁
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
Eraserhead vibes
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
They recommended a VPN service that didn't log IP, which includes theirs. And yeah, privacy-concerned libs are always anti-China. They also host fundraisers for liberal freeze peach orgs, including Bellingcat and Tor Project. So nothing new under the liberal sun. I don't think anyone is expecting tankie email services from such a company.
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
They log IP for the email service, not VPN service. They made a blog basically telling people to use a VPN to log into their email if they didn't want that to happen (the arrest part not the disclosing IP part)
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
"dough" and "mass" are the same word in Spanish
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
The fact that they consider voting ANC, which is the party that keeps the neoliberal status quo, as too radical is just so fucking disgusting
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
pinguinu
1w ago
•
100%
You may be wrongly ascribing that virtue to those soldiers (regardless of the rest of the network). They mention how their only goal is the release of the "israeli" hostages, they mention how they immediately enlisted following October 7, so they are still zionists, just not mindless. Same kind of people that go out in the streets waving "israeli" flags calling for hostages to be released. So they really believe in the occupation, just not in the way it is being handled. Self-preservation, not solidarity.
www.telesurenglish.net
As of this morning. Haven't read any reports from Hezbollah saying otherwise. Please post if that's no longer the case
I'm just wondering what their views are on other AES countries since they welcome private investment, except for DPRK of course
english.almayadeen.net
> "The moment these interceptors are deployed, the costs skyrocket," Aminoach said. > Aminoach further explained that the direct cost of the war amounts to roughly 130 billion shekels. However, when indirect costs are factored in, which the government will eventually need to address, the total could reach 250 billion shekels.
> The United States is sending a small number of additional troops to the Middle East given escalating tensions between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah, the Pentagon said on Monday, declining to specify the precise number or mission of the deployed forces. > "Out of an abundance of caution, we are sending a small number of additional U.S. military personnel forward to augment our forces that are already in the region," Air Force Major General Patrick Ryder, a Pentagon spokesperson, told reporters.
Damn, I didn't know comedy and the horror of war could be featured in a single movie. I'm left with a  kind of mood. Really recommend it.
